A gross yield near 4.0% is the number making me question whether this deal has enough room for error. The Dubai property is a one-bedroom duplex priced at AED 2,587,000, with projected rent of AED 8,616 a month, or AED 103,392 a year.
Its visible condition looks sound, and my model allows for empty periods, management, normal upkeep and a larger repair. Those assumptions can be adjusted later; an unexpected building obligation or major works contribution would be much harder to absorb at this yield.
Which figures should be verified before judging the return—unit-specific service charges and reserves, the basis of the rent estimate, tenant-turnover costs, management extras, or other recurring charges? I am less interested in defending the purchase price than in finding out whether the net cash flow properly rewards the building-level risk.
Its visible condition looks sound, and my model allows for empty periods, management, normal upkeep and a larger repair. Those assumptions can be adjusted later; an unexpected building obligation or major works contribution would be much harder to absorb at this yield.
Which figures should be verified before judging the return—unit-specific service charges and reserves, the basis of the rent estimate, tenant-turnover costs, management extras, or other recurring charges? I am less interested in defending the purchase price than in finding out whether the net cash flow properly rewards the building-level risk.