The difficulty is that active listings do not reveal how quickly the successful ones sold. In my sample of Delhi student housing between ₹30,060,000 and ₹45,090,000, the apparent marketing period is 98 days, but withdrawn properties and price reductions make that figure hard to interpret. A few unusual cases also seem linked to insurance issues.
Renovated stock appears to find buyers sooner, though that may reflect pricing or location rather than condition alone. Would a cohort based on original listing dates and verified completed sales be more useful? I am unsure whether withdrawals should count as failed marketing periods or remain in a separate category.
Renovated stock appears to find buyers sooner, though that may reflect pricing or location rather than condition alone. Would a cohort based on original listing dates and verified completed sales be more useful? I am unsure whether withdrawals should count as failed marketing periods or remain in a separate category.