I disagree that the price alone makes the listing implausible. Exact area, condition, privacy and included services could change the picture. The problem is that none of those details is available yet.
Fair point, but ₹635,700 per month requires more than a generic description. Even a premium property needs enough information for applicants to decide whether a viewing is worthwhile.
That distinction could also explain the one-bedroom description. If parts of the building are excluded, the advertised 200 m² should identify exactly what forms the tenancy.
Another practical issue is backup power, if any. Applicants should ask what equipment exists, what it serves and who pays its running or maintenance costs.
A viewing checklist is forming, but the listing needs basics first: locality, availability, furnishing, deposit range, lease length and what the 200 m² includes.
For maintenance, there should also be a distinction between tenant-caused damage, routine upkeep and failure of supplied systems. Those categories need clear lease wording.
Good question. The description should include bathrooms, kitchen type, storage and any study or utility room. “One-bed” says very little about such a large house.