bikesAndBook
Property manager
I need to choose between several selling proposals soon, and the trade-off is not simply the quoted percentage. The property is a Marrakech townhouse expected to sell for around MAD 13,760,000. One proposal is inexpensive but leaves more of the transaction work with me; another costs more and promises broader marketing, buyer screening, negotiation and support through closing.
I plan to put every offer on the same fee basis and request a written breakdown of who handles each stage. Beyond the headline package, I want to compare evidence for the suggested price, response times, how offers are reported, what happens if a deal collapses, who manages the file after instruction and how conflicts are disclosed.
Which of those answers would justify paying more? I am especially concerned that vague coordination language or weak buyer qualification could create costs and delays that the cheaper quote does not show.
I plan to put every offer on the same fee basis and request a written breakdown of who handles each stage. Beyond the headline package, I want to compare evidence for the suggested price, response times, how offers are reported, what happens if a deal collapses, who manages the file after instruction and how conflicts are disclosed.
Which of those answers would justify paying more? I am especially concerned that vague coordination language or weak buyer qualification could create costs and delays that the cheaper quote does not show.