The latest quote is 7.03% fixed for five years, which has raised a new question about how I should compare it. This is for a Kuala Lumpur property around MYR 5,687,000, and the cheaper headline option comes with arrangement charges and a different loan-to-value pricing band.
I’m inclined to model the actual five-year cash outflow rather than choose on rate alone: fees, monthly payments, permitted overpayments and the outstanding balance when the fixed term ends. Does APR add anything beyond a quick screening tool when the options are structured differently?
The outcome could also change if the fee is added to the loan, the mortgage cannot be moved to another property, or refinancing is unattractive after year five. What figures and written terms would you request from each lender before making the comparison?
I’m inclined to model the actual five-year cash outflow rather than choose on rate alone: fees, monthly payments, permitted overpayments and the outstanding balance when the fixed term ends. Does APR add anything beyond a quick screening tool when the options are structured differently?
The outcome could also change if the fee is added to the loan, the mortgage cannot be moved to another property, or refinancing is unattractive after year five. What figures and written terms would you request from each lender before making the comparison?