calm_sparrow
First-time buyer
Choosing the wrong comparison could leave me committed to a payment that only looks manageable on the headline rate. The property in Lisbon is around €717,600, and one offer is fixed at 6.38% for 30 years. Once the lender applied its fees and the relevant LTV band, the cheaper advertised option no longer looked straightforward.
My current rule is to use APR for an initial screen, then compare every euro paid over the period I realistically expect to keep the loan. If I am likely to hold it for 30 years, the long-term total matters; if I may move or repay earlier, arrangement charges, early-repayment terms and portability carry more weight. I am excluding property taxes from the lender comparison and do not want a future refinance to be the assumption that makes the payment affordable. Is that the right way to request like-for-like illustrations?
My current rule is to use APR for an initial screen, then compare every euro paid over the period I realistically expect to keep the loan. If I am likely to hold it for 30 years, the long-term total matters; if I may move or repay earlier, arrangement charges, early-repayment terms and portability carry more weight. I am excluding property taxes from the lender comparison and do not want a future refinance to be the assumption that makes the payment affordable. Is that the right way to request like-for-like illustrations?