The Nairobi market looks split rather than uniformly fast or slow. Duplexes in the KES 22,700,000–KES 34,060,000 range appear to be sitting for roughly 119 days, but properties with a clear property-tax position seem to move differently. Are buyers now securing meaningful reductions, or are sellers simply withdrawing and relisting? Recent completed examples would help, especially where the final price differed from the public asking history.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Are Nairobi duplex buyers negotiating more after 119 days?
- Thread starter round_workshop
- Start date
I would not treat 119 days alone as evidence of stronger negotiation. Which neighbourhoods are included, and are you counting relisted homes as new listings? Condition and the exact neighbourhood boundary can produce very different comparisons even within that price band. It would also help to separate financed buyers from others, since a longer completion process can make an agreed deal look like stale stock.
The public asking history may be the weakest part of the comparison. A seller can test an ambitious figure, cut it later, or withdraw without completing, so the apparent discount may exaggerate what was genuinely negotiable. I’d compare completed sales with the last realistic asking price, while noting when cuts happened, the property’s condition and whether the seller had a reason to move quickly. Clear tax information may reduce uncertainty without necessarily changing the final price much.
If withdrawn and recycled listings are treated as unsold homes, the 119-day figure could lead buyers to assume they have leverage that is not really there. The missing detail for me is whether the same pattern remains after separating neighbourhoods and tracing each property through relisting.
I’d follow a small set of close duplex comparables and note the original price, reductions, condition, days advertised and whether each one completed, disappeared or returned under a new listing. Add the final price and financing details where they are actually available. A weekly count of genuinely new stock would then help show whether supply is building or whether a few stale listings are distorting the picture.
I’d follow a small set of close duplex comparables and note the original price, reductions, condition, days advertised and whether each one completed, disappeared or returned under a new listing. Add the final price and financing details where they are actually available. A weekly count of genuinely new stock would then help show whether supply is building or whether a few stale listings are distorting the picture.