Search results

I’ll push back slightly on treating 3.2% gross as an automatic rejection. A buyer might accept low current income for personal use or a strong view on the property’s long-term value. But if this is meant to stand on rental cash flow alone, the deal needs a compelling reason to tolerate such a...

I’m not convinced that fewer dashboards automatically means less work. A single interface can still hide poor document versioning, weak permissions or an incomplete audit history. I would rather accept one extra screen than have staff download files, rename them and circulate copies because the...

I’d build a simple owner-only schedule: property tax, insurance, non-recoverable building charges, management, vacancy, turnover, apartment maintenance and extraordinary building contributions. Keep recoverable tenant expenses on a separate line so they don’t inflate either income or owner...

I’d build two figures: net operating yield on the R$2,016,000 price, and net yield on all cash committed, including transaction costs and initial work. Then show a normal year and a turnover year separately. There isn’t one compensating net yield without comparing it with your financing cost...

I’d make a simple sheet with first-seen date, exact location, build status, condition, asking price, any cut, withdrawal date and reappearance. Keep “sold” blank unless there is credible confirmation. After a month, you should be able to distinguish fresh volume from recycled stock without...

If a decision is due soon, I would not reject it solely because the gross figure is 4.9%, but I would make the rent evidence the deciding factor. A well-positioned 4-bed might hold tenants better than the headline yield suggests; an optimistic asking rent could erase that advantage. Run the...

Don’t let the deadline merge screening with move-in protection. Maintenance history, a clear condition record and agreed reporting arrangements are useful, but they don’t prove that one applicant will pay more reliably than another. Handle those consistently after selection. Waiting for a...

Is the ARS 1,264,000,000 offer itself in writing, and has the buyer shown anything supporting their ability to complete? Representation is only part of the issue. An unusually quick offer is less attractive if buyer qualification is vague or if nobody has explained what support you receive...

How old is the house, and will it be occupied during the work? Those two facts could alter the programme substantially. I’d also clarify whether the electrical allowance covers testing only or any remedial work, and whether bathrooms can reuse existing pipe routes. A survey should distinguish...

Some colleagues want one platform to own the whole property workflow; I hesitate because consolidation does not help if staff still copy information between screens. We have trialled tools for enquiries, paperwork, appointments and deal progress, but the handoff often loses the context needed by...