Search results

I’d divide it by priority rather than evenly: first mortgage payment and any confirmed service charge; moving and essential setup; a limited snagging or repair pot; then the emergency fund. Furniture comes last, except for basics you genuinely need on day one. Get actual quotes for the move...

What did you include in the affordability calculation? Furniture and cosmetic updates can wait, but the first mortgage payment, moving costs and anything identified by the inspection cannot. Also confirm whether there are any service charges despite it being detached, and look at the insurance...

Separate ordinary post-offer panic from the numbers. If the monthly payment still leaves a proper emergency fund after moving costs, necessary repairs and insurance, the feeling may just be the shock of commitment. If the plan only works by spending every spare euro or assuming nothing breaks...

Commercially, “as-is” can mean you priced in visible defects and will not seek ordinary repairs. An inspection contingency may still provide a decision point, but its actual effect depends entirely on its wording and the stage of the Irish transaction. The seller can refuse a credit without...

Condition probably affects both outcomes. A buyer with limited cash after financing may avoid a property needing work, while a motivated buyer may negotiate. The missing piece is what happened to listings that disappeared: completed sale, withdrawal, or relisting. Without that, 105 days could be...

On that information alone, I’d lean toward property-level variation. The price span is wide enough that different neighbourhoods, condition and maintenance burdens could be mixed together. Also, 74 days for current listings excludes homes that were withdrawn, so it may not describe the whole...

I partly disagree that 35 days is too little to matter. It can matter when new competing listings are arriving and the original one has had no visible price movement. It just doesn’t tell you how much leverage exists. Ask whether there have been offers, whether any deal fell through, and whether...

Thirty-five days by itself would not make me assume the seller is ready to negotiate. Condition, location and the number of credible buyers matter more. I would still offer below asking if the maintenance uncertainty supports it, but explain the costs or risks behind the figure rather than...

Also test the rent rather than only the applicant. If it is above what the likely household can comfortably sustain, increasingly strict screening will not solve the underlying mismatch. Compare affordability using the rent you will actually charge, not an optimistic future figure.

Do not blend deposit handling into applicant quality. Whatever process applies in Ireland should be followed after selection for every tenant. Asking for unusual deposit arrangements from someone you consider riskier would undermine the consistency you are trying to create.

Retention matters here because turnover on a large house can mean vacancy time, preparation work and multiple maintenance issues appearing at once. Ask about intended tenancy length in the same neutral way, but treat the answer as an intention, not a promise.

I have three proposals for selling a coastal home in Dublin. The fee gap is meaningful, but the services are not comparable: one includes photography and negotiation, while another charges separately for nearly everything once the listing is live. What questions best reveal real value—recent...

Fair questions. The 17 days is a rough current marketing period, not a measure of how long completed transactions took, so I shouldn’t read it as a sale-speed figure. I’ll tighten the neighbourhood grouping and separate price-cut or relisting cases where they can be identified. Comparing energy...

I would revise one part of my first answer: income should not dominate merely because it is easiest to measure. High income does not predict careful treatment of the property or a long stay. Affordability is a threshold; beyond that, more income may add little.

I have to settle on a method shortly, but I do not want an August 2024 snapshot to dictate the conclusion. My notes cover a narrow group of detached Dublin homes advertised between €982,600 and €1,474,000, with only about 17 days on the market so far. Energy performance appears to separate the...

A simple scoring sheet would help: verified income at the stated rent, evidence of payment reliability, confirmed tenancy dates, and unexplained inconsistencies. Set the weighting before choosing. Also record why any application was declined, using the same categories for everyone.

References deserve caution. A glowing reference may be vague, while a restrained one may simply come from someone unwilling to discuss a former tenant. Ask every referee the same factual questions and note unanswered items rather than interpreting tone.

One missing fact: are you assessing a single household, several unrelated adults, or applications with different household structures? With five bedrooms, affordability may depend on several incomes. Decide beforehand whether each person, the group collectively, or both must meet your standard.

I would give most weight to verified ability to pay the actual rent, then to specific rental-history facts rather than a reference saying someone was “excellent.” Dates, payment regularity and how the tenancy ended are more useful. Credit history can support that picture, but it should not...