Search results

So the table needs at least four clearly separated measures: unique active inventory, new listings, completed sales, and asking-price changes. The headline should then state exactly which measure produced +4.8% and 16 days. If completed-sale evidence arrives later, it should be a dated...

Possibly, but I would not publish increasingly narrow neighbourhood cuts until the sample count is shown. Thin groups can look dramatic for accidental reasons. Start with broad areas, disclose how many unique properties are in each, then subdivide only where there is enough evidence.

Agreed on relisting, but there is another missing split: does “apartments” combine distinct market segments, or is this limited to one segment? A blended figure could move because the property-type mix changed even if prices within each group did not.

The +4.8% is difficult to interpret without a comparison period. Is it month-on-month, year-on-year, or the difference between original and current asking prices? We also need the sample definition: unique apartments, individual listings, or every listing appearance including relists.

A written scope is useful, but I would not treat it as sufficient by itself. The important part is whether the exclusions are specific. Valuation, legal work, tax questions and final lending decisions should not be left in a vague grey area. In Indonesia, anyone considering the service should...