Search results

I’m considering a ₩1,042,000,000 property in Seoul and can afford the purchase at today’s 5.82% mortgage rate. I’m torn between buying now and waiting for cheaper finance, because lower rates could bring buyers back before local inventory improves and push prices up. Rather than trying to...

The -6.2% figure needs clarification first. Is it the change in asking prices over the month, reductions made during individual listings, or a comparison with July last year? Those tell very different stories. I would also separate new-build and resale townhouses before drawing conclusions from...

I partly disagree with focusing heavily on the 110 days. Time listed gives you permission to test the seller, but it does not prove they need to discount. The stronger presentation is a clean, complete offer with a realistic deadline and few moving parts. Let the price stand on its own instead...

Seven percent below does not sound insulting after 110 days, provided the offer is presented as a considered number rather than a criticism of the property. Keep the rationale short: limited completed-sale evidence, updating required, and uncertainty around major costs. Attach whatever financing...

The detailed quote has now arrived, and it raises a different question from the headline rate. For a Seoul purchase of around ₩462,300,000, the lender describes the offer as 4.64% fixed over 30 years. The initial promotion looked cheaper, but the final pricing reflects both the fee structure and...

What feedback did you receive during the original marketing period? If several viewers questioned price or condition, that matters more than the failed buyer’s explanation alone. If interest was solid and financing was the only confirmed failure, a pre-emptive reduction seems harder to justify.

A simple table should settle most of this. Use identical principal, repayment and start date, then list monthly payment, upfront fees, balance remaining, and total cash paid at several plausible exit dates plus year 30. Keep portability and early-repayment terms in separate columns rather than...

I’m trying to sense-check a small sample of Seoul listings before drawing conclusions from the headline numbers. The asking-price bracket is ₩419,500,000 to ₩629,300,000, mostly for mixed-use buildings, and the typical listing has been visible for 113 days. My working theory is that buyer...

One unresolved point is property condition. If descriptions are inconsistent, broad categories such as apparent work needed, apparently usable, and unknown are safer than detailed ratings.

For a two-year fix, I would start with total cash paid over those two years: instalments, arrangement fees and any compulsory costs in the offer, minus the principal repaid. APR is useful, but it can obscure your likely holding period and whatever assumptions are made about the rate after year...

What deposit is assumed alongside the ₩10,430,000 monthly rent, and is that rent supported by a signed lease or merely the broker’s expectation? That missing detail could change the comparison considerably. I’d also want to know whether you are buying with cash or debt, plus the expected lease...

I’ve spent 54 days comparing an 85 m² coastal home with a similarly priced detached home in Seoul. The coastal option appears easier to maintain, while the detached house offers more control but potentially larger, irregular bills. I’m modelling transaction fees, insurance, energy use and resale...

Also show every point if practical. With a modest property set, a dot plot reveals more than a polished average.

I’d now avoid publishing one blended 32-day number. Present it as a starting observation, followed by separate durations for completed cases and current ages for active ones.

Same at the ₩1,383,000,000 upper boundary. Otherwise a cut can make a stale property look like a newly relevant listing without showing its prior exposure.

A limited trial on the Seoul board sounds sensible before changing every market board. Keep it optional, collapsed on mobile, and limited to value, amount/percentage, and a short explanation. Then the forum can see whether members complete it consistently and whether people actually use the...

Start by separating neighbourhoods and building condition. “Seoul” is too broad for warehouse comparisons, and two similar asking prices may hide very different access or repair needs. Also, 119 days visible does not necessarily mean 119 days continuously available if listings are withdrawn and...

One clarification: I also want to avoid treating “no structural extension” as meaning there is no structural risk. If any internal walls or openings are affected, I would want their status confirmed rather than assumed. Would you keep the contingency outside the ₩308.3m working figure, or...

I want a budget that survives the renovation, not one that only covers the visible finishes. The obstacle is how little I know about concealed moisture, pipe routes and the electrical installation in this 80 m² Seoul condo. The working figure is ₩308,300,000 for new kitchen and bathroom work...

Which returns us to Elena’s question: completed deals may not tell the identical story if buyers accepted awkward leases after discounts that active asking prices do not show.