A first look at financing sensitivity has raised a harder question: how much room is there for vacancy or higher building costs before this stops being worthwhile?
The Helsinki property is a 4-bed new-build flat priced at €1,122,000, with projected rent of €5,002 per month. That is around 5.3% gross. I have budgeted for management, ordinary upkeep, empty periods, insurance and a maintenance reserve, but I do not yet understand the full flow of property tax and housing-company charges.
The rent assumption is therefore only useful if it is supported by comparable signed rents and if I know what it includes. I am also testing higher financing costs rather than relying on one rate. Which would you resolve first: the achievable rent and likely vacancy, or the building-level charges that cannot easily be changed after purchase? What net return would leave enough margin for the remaining uncertainty?
The Helsinki property is a 4-bed new-build flat priced at €1,122,000, with projected rent of €5,002 per month. That is around 5.3% gross. I have budgeted for management, ordinary upkeep, empty periods, insurance and a maintenance reserve, but I do not yet understand the full flow of property tax and housing-company charges.
The rent assumption is therefore only useful if it is supported by comparable signed rents and if I know what it includes. I am also testing higher financing costs rather than relying on one rate. Which would you resolve first: the achievable rent and likely vacancy, or the building-level charges that cannot easily be changed after purchase? What net return would leave enough margin for the remaining uncertainty?