For the next observation, note what happened to every July listing: still advertised, reduced, withdrawn or completed. That simple follow-through should answer more than another citywide headline.
Your vacancy model should differ by property rather than applying one percentage to both. Ask who would rent 40 m², who would rent the detached home, what compromises each location involves, and how long each target household might realistically stay.
That sounds like the right level of caution. I’d retain an archived November 2025 entry, attach links to any later evidence, and place completed sales in their own section. For the $990,000 point, compare properties below, around and above that level using the same time-on-market rule; if the...
I’d publish the figures, but with a compact methodology note rather than waiting for a perfect dataset. Label the 5.7% as asking-price movement, the 50 days as indicative time on market, and the $1,095,000 point as an observed area of financing sensitivity—not a proven threshold. Then add...