Recent content by countTheAnchor

  1. C

    Before we commit: one buyer platform or a connected toolset?

    I disagree slightly with the focus on reducing dashboard count. Two tools with a reliable handoff can be safer than one suite with weak permission controls and document versioning. For the trial, give different users limited roles, revise the same document twice, change a listing detail after a...
  2. C

    Offering 3% below asking on a serviced apartment in Nairobi — sensible or too aggressive after 23 days

    Agreed on separating cosmetic updating from inspection defects. I would submit KES 177,025,000 with financing evidence, a flexible completion window and a concise response deadline. The note can say the price reflects the available comparable evidence and anticipated updating, not a list of...
  3. C

    Offering 3% below asking on a serviced apartment in Nairobi — sensible or too aggressive after 23 days

    Three percent does not sound aggressive in that context. Keep the explanation short: limited evidence from completed sales, updating costs and your ability to offer a straightforward timetable. Proof of financing and flexibility may matter more to the seller than another small movement in price...
  4. C

    Nairobi inventory changed in August 2025, but is the signal real?

    The 2.2% figure is not very informative unless each completed price is matched to that property’s final asking price. Comparing current asking inventory with a separate batch of completed sales mixes different homes and different time periods. I would treat buyer selectivity as plausible, but...
  5. C

    Nairobi market check: -6.1% movement and 30 days on market?

    Agreed on separating developments, though energy performance can still be tested rather than dismissed. I’d build two small tables: active and withdrawn listings in one, completed sales in the other. For each flat, record the exact neighbourhood, type, original and current ask, first reduction...
  6. C

    Offering 5% below asking on a new-build flat in Nairobi — sensible or too aggressive?

    I also wouldn’t lead with a long list of repair credits. Make the 5% offer on the information currently available, then reserve specific remedies for findings during inspection. Otherwise the seller may read KES 126,255,000 as only the start of further reductions. Any deposit release and refund...
  7. C

    Nairobi market check: -6.1% movement and 30 days on market?

    Thirty days alone is hard to interpret if withdrawn and relisted stock is missing. I’d also be cautious about attributing the discount to energy performance: overall condition may be standing in for several differences between flats. Is the -6.1% based on completed prices, current asking...
  8. C

    Offering 5% below asking on a new-build flat in Nairobi — sensible or too aggressive?

    One more point: separate financing approval from valuation. You could be capable of borrowing yet still face an appraisal below the agreed price because completed comparables are thin. Before offering, decide how much appraisal gap, if any, you could cover. Don’t promise to cover an unlimited...
  9. C

    Offering 5% below asking on a new-build flat in Nairobi — sensible or too aggressive?

    On contingencies, “new-build” would not persuade me to waive inspection. The updating may be cosmetic, but an inspection can distinguish that from work affecting systems, finishes or handover quality. Define the inspection period and what happens if material issues appear; an open-ended right to...
See more
Back
Top